Who wants to join my bible group?
mex
— 28 Sep 2007 21:26
Subject: the lord works in mysterious ways
or maybe he just wants to see england gubbed by the aussies
ei
— 30 Sep 2007 16:01
Subject: Re: Re: Re: re indoctrination
Forgive me for interrupting but I think I might be able to put your mind to rest. The bible at 27mm was just too thick, the teachings of Buddha was a bit better as was the Koran but it was the combination of two Bhaktivedanta paperbacks and the teachings of Mao Tsetung (abridged) that finally sorted out my wobbly table. Suggest you find a wobbly table to put your bible to best use! Congratulations on your nuptials butâ¦â¦ bible group⦠eh?â¦. get a grip! Iâm with fxâ¦..definitely smelling shite!
eix
— 30 Sep 2007 19:18
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: re indoctrination
sorry...missed the x......is it compulsory?
kix
— 30 Sep 2007 21:21
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re indoctrination
whilst the x is not obligatory it is good form to use it
not going to bible class on the other hand IS compulsory
dempsn
— 01 Oct 2007 17:13
Subject: Re: re indoctrination
my 2 cents:
dawkins et al may have actually done the cause of rationalism more harm than good by attacking religious types, who then feel compelled to take up extreme 'science vs religion' literalist stance
grix
— 01 Oct 2007 18:16
Subject: Re: Re: re indoctrination
Religious types do not seem to need much compulsion to take up extreme views. I salute Dawkins for speaking out - we have been far too respectful of religion
Reply
providers of synthetic therapeutic virtual-chemical-combination therapy for humans since before fuckin ages ago